CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF GENETIC EVALUATION AND GENETIC COUNSELING
|
Individual with global developmental delay/non-specific mental retardation |
Date: 6/19/98* |
|
Disclaimer The "Critical Element of Genetic Evaluation and Genetic Counseling" was written and approved by genetic professionals and perinatologists within the state of Washington. The document is to act as an aid to medical geneticists, genetic counselors, and perinatologists who practice within our state. This Critical Element of Genetic Evaluation and Genetic Counseling does not define the applicable standard of care, nor is it intended to dictate an exclusive course for the diagnosis, counseling, treatment or management of genetic conditions or birth defects. The authors acknowledge that appropriate clinical practices may vary depending upon a number of factors including, among others, the needs and choices of the individual patient, the resources available, and limitations unique to the particular institution or type of practice.
Information obtained from patient/family 1. Review patient/family questions; reason for referral; knowledge base; perception of disease status and/or risk; what diagnoses have been considered; perceived notion about causation; assess need for professional interpreter: 2a. Using standard symbols, obtain family history (1st and 2nd degree relatives to consultand, and further removed as appropriate). Note ethnic background, consanguinity, ongoing pregnancies, and other significant family history. b. Additional directed family history: pregnancy losses, infant deaths, males or females with developmental disabilities (including mental retardation, learning difficulties, special education), regression or plateauing of skills, autism, seizures, thyroid disorder, cerebral palsy, ADHD, institutionalization, psychosis, emotional disorder, alcoholism, drug abuse. c. Obtain relevant medical records on patient, including records of 1).appropriate tests/evaluations: prenatal and birth records, results of newborn screening, growth data, especially OFC, pediatric, neurologic, and genetic evaluations, including chromosome analysis, FISH, DNA testing, metabolic testing, imaging studies, EEG, EMG results 2). records bearing on management: developmental testing/psychometric and school evaluations, and 3). on other family members as needed: developmental disabilities, epilepsy. 3. Obtain prenatal and perinatal history of patient, including prenatal exposures, pregnancy complications and prenatal testing, when appropriate: maternal diabetes, PKU, thyroid disorders, EtOH and drug exposures. 4. Obtain past medical history (including environmental/occupational exposures) focusing on:
5. Obtain information on growth and development, including school placement. For adult, also obtain information on education, employment and social functioning: results of formal testing including motor, language, psychometric, and psychological. 6. Assess family functioning and use of community resources. Assess personal, social, religious, ethnocultural issues: observe family interactions during appointment 7. Assess possible ethical concerns, such as confidentiality, non-paternity, insurability, discrimination, prenatal diagnosis: 8 Perform general physical examination of patient and other family members if indicated, with attention to: growth parameters including ht, wt, OFC and percentiles, and other physical measurements as indicated; body odor; minor or major malformations; coarsening of features; quality and quantity of hair; Wood's lamp examination of the skin as indicated; hepatosplenomegaly; neurologic abnormalities, spasticity/hypotonia, weakness, ataxia, and other movement disorders; voice quality and speech pattern including velo-pharyngeal incompetence; level of activity, affect, attention span, social skills, inappropriate behaviors, including self-stimulation and self-multilization. If microcephaly or macrocephaly in patient, then measure of OFC of parents and sibs. 9. Other issues to consider: Other family members with ongoing pregnancy; reproductive issues for patient, establishment of legal guardianship for mentally retarded persons > 18 years of age.
Information to be provided or discussed with the patient/family (this may occur in a series of multiple patient visits) 1. Summarize information obtained and discuss with patient/family the (possible) diagnosis and the degree of certainty of the diagnosis based on available information. 2. a. Recommend relevant tests/evaluations on patient and/or on other relatives which may include:
b. Discuss sensitivity/specificity of test(s)/evaluation(s): relative to tests deemed necessary. 3. Discuss the following issues related to natural history: prognosis, developmental outcome/intellectual functioning, anticipated possible medical complications, including pregnancy related risks for affected women if indicated, and preventive measures: 4. Review inheritance pattern (including penetrance and expressivity): depends on final diagnosis; empiric numbers may be appropriate if no diagnosis established (see references). Note: Recurrence risks vary with number of affected relatives and degree of relation. 5. Assess and discuss recurrence risk for future pregnancies, for affected and at risk individuals. Discuss general background risk for birth defects, and recommendations for preconceptional and prenatal use of 0.4 mg folate per day. Include any additional risk based on family history/ethnicity/maternal age/maternal disease/maternal exposure/others: 6a. Discuss reproductive options (e.g. assisted reproductive technologies, adoption, taking risk and no additional pregnancies) when appropriate: b. Discuss prenatal diagnostic options/issues: dependent upon etiology determined. (or referral for discussion of) 7. Review management recommendations/options including screening protocols: Special education. 8. Consider referral to: Developmental Pediatrics, Psychology, Psychiatry, Social Work Services, Neurology, Rehabilitation Medicine, Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, speech therapy, and nutrition services. 9. Address psychosocial issues including anticipatory guidance, patient and family reaction to diagnosis, need for community support services.
10. Address follow-up issues, such as genetic counseling for extended family members, including a plan for relaying test results: depending on diagnosis, plan follow-up in 2-3 years or earlier if parents are planning an additional pregnancy or become pregnant. 11. Document clinic visit, including persons present, and subsequent substantive contacts (e.g. clinic note, +/- letter to referral source, +/- letter to family; other). Document length of visit 12. Other issues to consider: If patient is an adult, level of understanding of genetic counseling, issues of informed consent, and legal guardianship 13. References and/or other protocols: 1. Curry, CJ, et al: Evaluation of mental retardation; Recommendations of a Consensus Conference. AJMG 72:468-477, 1997. 2. Crow, YJ, Tolmie, JL: Recurrence risks in mental retardation. J. Med Gen 35:177-182, 1998. 3. Harper, PS: Practical Genetic Counseling, Fourth Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Boston, 1995. 4. Finucane, B: Working with Women who Have Mental Retardation, A Genetic Counselor’s Guide, Elwyn, Inc., Elwyn, Pennsylvania, 1998. 5. Rapin I: Physicians’ testing of children with developmental disabilities. J Child Neuro 10 Supp 1:S11,1995. 6. Palmer FB, Capute AJ: Mental retardation. Pediatr in Rev 15:473, 1994. 7. Schaefer GB, Bodensteiner JB: Evaluation of the child with idiopathic mental retardation. PCNA 39:929, 1992. 8. Majnemer A, Shevell MI: Diagnostic yield of the neurologic assessment of the developmentally delayed child. J Pediatr 127:193, 1995. 9. Bodensteiner J: Anatomic variation and mental retardation: Review of midline cerebral anomalies. J Child Neurol 10:234, 1995. 10. Levy SE, Hyman SL: Pediatric assessment of the child with developmental delay. PNA 40:465, 1993. 11. First LR, Palfrey JS: The infant or young child with developmental delay. NEJM 330:478, 1994. 12. Glass, IA: X-linked mental retardation. J Med Genet 28:361, 1991. 13. Costeff H, Weller L: The risk of having a second retarded child. Am J Med Genet. 27:753, 1987. 14. Bundey S, Thake A, Todd J: The recurrence risks for mild idiopathic mental retardation. J Med Genet. 26:260, 1989. 15. Gibson KM et al; The Clinical Phenotype of Succinic Semialdehyde Dehydrogenase Deficiency (4-hydroxybutyric aciduria): Case Reports of 23 New Patients. Pediatr 99:567,1997.
* This Critical Element of Genetic Evaluation & Genetic Counseling was unanimously approved at a state genetics practitioners meeting on 6/19/98.
CRITICAL ELEMENTS OF GENETIC EVALUATION AND GENETIC COUNSELING
Disclaimer The "Critical Element of Genetic Evaluation and Genetic Counseling" was written and approved by genetic professionals and perinatologists within the state of Washington. The document is to act as an aid to medical geneticists, genetic counselors, and perinatologists who practice within our state. This Critical Element of Genetic Evaluation and Genetic Counseling does not define the applicable standard of care, nor is it intended to dictate an exclusive course for the diagnosis, counseling, treatment or management of genetic conditions or birth defects. The authors acknowledge that appropriate clinical practices may vary depending upon a number of factors including, among others, the needs and choices of the individual patient, the resources available, and limitations unique to the particular institution or type of practice.
Information to be obtained from patients/family 1. Review patient/family questions; reason for referral; knowledge base; perception of disease status and/or risk; what diagnoses have been considered; perceived notion of causation; assess need for professional interpreter: 2a. Using standard symbols, obtain family history (1st and 2nd degree relatives to consultand, and further removed as appropriate). Note ethnic background, consanguinity, ongoing pregnancies, and other significant family history. b. Additional directed family history: pregnancy losses, infant deaths, males or females with developmental disabilities (including mental retardation, learning difficulties, special education), regression or plateauing of skills, autism, seizures, thyroid disorder, cerebral palsy, ADHD, institutionalization, psychosis, emotional disorder, alcoholism, drug abuse. c. Obtain relevant medical records on patient/affected family member(s), including records on appropriate diagnostic testing/evaluation: chromosome analysis, FISH, DNA analysis (including Fragile X), metabolic testing, neuroimaging testing, EEG or EMG results, medical genetics, neurology and other specialty evaluations, and on other family members as needed: 3. Obtain patient's past and current pregnancy history; documenting gestational age, Rh, prenatal exposures, pregnancy complications and pertinent prenatal testing to date. 4. Obtain patient's past medical history. 5. Obtain information on education, employment and social functioning as appropriate. 6. Assess family functioning and use of community resources, as appropriate. Assess personal (e.g. social, ethnocultural, religious) issues, including feelings about prenatal testing and consequences. 7. Assess ethical issues, such as confidentiality, insurability, discrimination and non-paternity. 8. Other issues to consider:
Information to be provided or discussed with patient/family (this may occur in a series of multiple patient visits) 1a. Discuss risk of specific condition occurring in current pregnancy based on information available. Arrange for additional tests/evaluations on consultand and/or father of the baby if indicated: Clarify mother’s carrier or affected status based on diagnosis of affected relative. b. Discuss sensitivity/specificity of test(s)/evaluation(s): c. Discuss referral of other family members for genetic testing/evaluation if inheritable disease is suspected and confirmation is necessary. 2a. Discuss general background risk for birth defects, including any additional risk based on family history/ethnicity/maternal age/maternal disease/maternal exposure/others: b. Discuss inheritance pattern of disorder, including risk for future pregnancies: Empiric numbers may be appropriate if no diagnosis is established (see references). Note: Recurrence risks vary with number of affected relatives and degree of relation. 3. Discuss the following issues related to natural history: prognosis, developmental outcome/intellectual functioning, anticipated possible medical complications, including pregnancy related risks for affected women if indicated, and preventive measures: 4a. Review prenatal testing options as indicated:
b. Discuss risks and limitations of prenatal testing options, including sensitivity/specificity of test method(s): 5. Explore psychosocial impact of testing vs. non-testing, ethical issues, and discuss the decision making process. Refer to outside resources as appropriate to help with decision making. (Process includes the discussion of outcomes/results, additional testing, option of termination of pregnancy, pediatric follow up, and support groups). 6. Document status of decision making by patient/family. 7. Make arrangements for testing if desired and plan for relaying results and for follow-up. 8. Consider referral to specific community resources and support groups. 9. Document the clinic visit, including persons present, and subsequent substantive contacts (e.g. clinic note, +/- letter to referring source, +/- letter to family, other). Document length of visit. 10. Other issues to consider: Level of understanding of genetic counseling, issues of informed consent, and legal guardianship. 11. References and/or other protocols: 1. Curry, CJ, et al: Evaluation of mental retardation; Recommendations of a Consensus Conference. AJMG 72:468-477, 1997. 2. Crow, YJ, Tolmie, JL: Recurrence risks in mental retardation. J. Med Gen 35:177-182, 1998. 3. Harper, PS: Practical Genetic Counseling, Fourth Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Boston, 1995. 4. Glass I: X-linked mental retardation. J Med Genet 28:361, 1991. 5. Bundley S, Thake A, Todd J: The recurrence risks for mild idiopathic mental retardation. J Med Genet 26:260, 1989. 6. Accardo PJ, Whitman BY: Children of mentally retarded parents. AJDC 144: 69, 1990. 7. Whitman BY, Graves B, Accardo PJ: The mentally retarded parent in the community: identification method and needs assessment survey. Am J Ment Defic 91: 838, 1987.
* This Critical Element of Genetic Evaluation & Genetic Counseling was unanimously approved at a state genetics practitioners meeting on 6/19/98.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||